Scene: Somewhat minor commercial street though a more-or-less ordinary town. Two lane road bordered by sidewalks with trees planted in the middle of repurposed sewer grates and maybe a fire hydrant kind of near the corner over there. Small shops with assorted wares displayed in the front windows. It’s one of those afternoons on a weekend that's just about smack dab in the middle of spring. The temperatures allow, for the first time in months, folks to be out and about without bulky coats and scarves and the like. Cars go by on the road at the appropriate speed and at curiously regular intervals. The sidewalks are just as active as people move without the added weight of winter wear.
Now, we’ll take a bit of a still shot of this idyllic scene, why not. Let’s identify one person in particular and label them as ‘A.’ This person, right in front of a shop selling business attire at business casual prices, is walking east. A second person we’ll label ‘B’ is on the same sidewalk but moving counter to A a couple storefronts down. A candy store or something, probably. Neither A nor B are looking in the shops they are near, but are more concerned with keeping with flow of foot traffic and not accidentally making contact with any fellow passing pedestrians.
Advance the scene just a little bit and we have both A and B, among with all the other people around that don’t deserve letters, a few yards closer to each other. Somewhere in these few seconds, there is a recognition. Not of each other personally, as A and B have never met previous to this, but of the other person as, more or less, a moving object to avoid. So, along with seeing each other as a future obstacle, the brains of each A and B use some low level processing to form a first impression of the other.
Here is where it gets a little muddled. Right after the low level brain activities, information gathered there is moved to the newer parts of the brain. This is where the initial impression of ‘probably won’t eat you’ from the low level parts will expand from that first established axiom. High level functioning then fills in the blanks about the other person using fancy tricks like inference, prejudices, and extrapolation. From there, it goes to yet more sophisticated brain areas to determine whether or not verbal and/or non-verbal contact should be initiated and so on. To keep that part simple, it’s more or less three short hops and a handful of chemical messengers from ‘will mostly likely not eat or dismember me’ to ‘I should buy that person a drink.’ Let’s go back about a hop and a half here and use our high level processes to ponder ‘what comes first?’
After the initial assessment of limited danger, what’s the first thing the high level processing assigns to the other person? It’s probably a safe bet to rule out a decision about whether their eye color matches their shoes and the like. After all, we just got done assuring ourselves they are not a danger to us, therefore we probably don’t give a tinker’s dam about their ability to coordinate colors. That’s for later, potentially. Characteristics such as relative height (will I be crushed underfoot?) and relative weight (will I have to move across the street to make room?) are pretty quickly introduced and pretty quickly forgotten, provided these fall within accepted limits. Any gross abnormalities (missing/extra limbs, excessive asymmetry) are noted as well here. Soon after all that nonsense, the sex of the other person is processed. From there, a million effectively pre-loaded, pseudo a priori bits of knowledge are funneled in. These bits, formed by previous experience(s) with that sex and other gathered information at present time, fill in the blanks and form a sort of ‘good enough’ impression of the other person.
Now, obviously we cannot build another person’s personality and such based on our own ideas of what that person should be/do/think. We ain’t even getting into it that much here, mostly because I got other stuff to do this afternoon. For the low level purposes here, it’s enough to know the other person is not a threat and is male or female (don’t even talk to me about the binary nature of this sort of thing. If you understood that as a binary, then you know well enough that I’m just playing to the audience here, and you needn’t get all cross with me. Won’t do you no good no how. If you didn’t see that as dichotomous, do an experiment for me. Go on out where there are plenty of people and try not to assign them a sex at first glance. Go on. Let me know how that goes).
So, since we’re all kinds of low level, first impression here, I ask you this, dear reader: how does one swap that initial assessment of a stranger’s sex to be the opposite? What would person B need to exhibit to be seen as the opposite sex by person A? Don’t worry, this ain’t no quiz. I got your answer right here. Given the incredible range of appearance in both sexes, there must be a wide range to fall into, which benefits those seeking counter-identification w/r/t sex. So, because we can’t all wear a sign urging folks to think of us as one or the other, we all must do what we can to enhance or highlight those characteristics most commonly associated with our desired sex.*
Therefore, if an individual is all about being identified one way or the other to passing folks’ low level processes, they had better ensure that their secondary sex characteristics are all in appropriate order. Why not primary? One, go find an anatomy textbook. Two, because if you wanted to be seen as female and showed someone a pair of ovaries, there’s going to be a boat load of questions you might not want to answer without an attorney present. For example, if person B wishes to be identified as female, then they must have appropriate shapes and angles indicating just that.
Maybe you’re thinking ‘why the heck does it matter?’ Maybe you’re thinking that you shouldn't have bought swiss instead of cheddar last night. In regards to the latter, you bought swiss because you are uneducated. Of course, those actually paying attention here may ask the former, in which case, why indeed? Why does it matter what a particular person, who you will have very limited contact with and will never express anything to you, thinks your sex is? Who cares what person A thinks, anyway? They probably didn’t even finish high school and, by all measures and appearances, smokes too much.
See, it’s one of those things that is way more internal than external. Person A will most likely never tell person B what sex they initially assigned them. They’re just passing on a sidewalk, and that ain’t no time to discuss the fluid nature of sex, gender, attraction, and such.** The terrible thing is, in this example, person B will never know how they are seen by person A.
Expanding this, let’s say person B does have all the secondary sex characteristics of a female, is wearing female-appropriate clothes, and appears to have congruent mannerisms. Person B has no way, aside from pinning person A against a wall and inquiring directly, to know how they are seen by others.
Anyway, the scene has been held long enough. Motion continues with person A and person B passing by each other with nary any communication between them. Primarily, given the lack of contact or communication, this doubt about projected sex is really all on person B. Person B could continue to doubt and push farther and farther toward female stereotypes in order to be correctly identified more often by other folks’ first impression. This is asymptotic most likely and probably exhausting after a while. Or person B could not let the weird forced binary of the subject affect them and be content with a batting average somewhere over .500. Either way, I guess.
So, I suppose the take home message here is it doesn’t really matter too much how person B is assigned by the automatic reactions of person A. It only matters how person B is affected by person A potentially assigning person B to one sex or the other in those first fractions of a second. Person A becomes only relevant as a mirror of sorts, reflecting back person B’s concept of person B. This is especially true given the complete lack of affirmation or negation from person A. Dig?
Unless, of course, person A’s high level functioning decides person A ought to ask if they can buy person B a drink. In that case, someone is in for a surprise after drinks.***
*Hey, yeah, that paragraph was indeed ‘victim to the cis-oppresive idea of gender and sex as binary constructs.’ What can you do? I got an audience to connect with, and ain’t all of them up in arms about this. Either way, hate the game, not the playa, yo.
**There, I got the fluidity of sex, gender, and whatever else in there. Happy? Good. Don’t be so pedantic next time, huh?
***Did I just make the easy ‘person B ain’t no weatherman, but person A can expect a few inches tonight’ joke? Yeah, I went there. Mostly because it is a solid joke, and as serious as everything is, it ain’t all that serious.